Home Content Studio Where’s Waldo? Your Ads Deserve More Attention

Where’s Waldo? Your Ads Deserve More Attention

SHARE:

This article is sponsored by Adelaide Metrics.

In the classic Where’s Waldo? books, Waldo was visible – but often well-hidden in a sea of other people. It often took several minutes before you could find him in the crowd – spotted only because of his famous red-and-white striped hat. Today, on many websites, ad placements have taken on Waldo-like characteristics – viewable, but not capturing much attention.

Viewability is important, and it represents an important hygienic step for the web to begin removing low-value impressions from the market. But where it becomes a problem is when advertisers conflate viewability as a measure of media quality.

Slowly but surely, viewability goals were put into place, and tools were developed to optimize placements to be highly viewable – instead of high quality.

Now, a decade after the 3MS initiative that led to viewability, it will take a new approach to restore high-impact ad measurement.

The Rise of Attention Metrics

The digital measurement space has come alive in the past couple of years with innovation around attention metrics. Just last month, The Attention Council released The Link Between Attention Metrics and Outcomes, a meta-analysis of more than 50 case studies proving the connection between attention and brand outcomes throughout the marketing funnel. Across more than 20 brand categories, overwhelming evidence demonstrated the benefits of attention metrics compared to existing metrics like viewability and completion rate.

To see how attention is rewriting ad measurement to bring outcomes back to the forefront, let’s take a closer look at three examples from the report. Please note, the data in each of these studies has been indexed to protect the privacy of our clients:

Case study #1: Attention optimizations increase brand lift for a healthcare client

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

This A/B study was conducted by a large healthcare brand focused on driving upper-funnel business outcomes. Our findings reveal that attention-optimized placements yielded 85% greater impact on brand familiarity and 77% greater impact on brand perception than viewability-optimized placements, as verified by a third-party brand lift vendor.

Case study #2: Proving the link between attention and lower-funnel action per impression for a financial services brand

This financial services brand wanted to better understand the quality of their media for an open-web display campaign, as well as improve their price-to-performance ratio, a primary KPI. The study indicates a very strong positive correlation between attention and lower-funnel action per impression. High attention media drove 2.5X the number of transactions – or customer deposits – for the bank compared to low attention media.

Case study #3: Driving brand lift and efficiency gains for a technology client

One of the most recognized technology brands in the world sought a more efficient and effective method for driving brand lift. In this final study, one group of viewers was exposed to attention-optimized media, while another was exposed to viewability-optimized media. The attention-optimized group tracked 6% higher familiarity and 20% higher unique reach than the viewability-optimized group. Attention optimizations also led to 12.8% higher average attention and proved 31% more cost effective.

Upgrading Your Metrics

Using attention metrics as measures of media quality is a nuanced undertaking. For example, sometimes duration is a key measure of placement quality, while other times it indicates creative relevance. To solve this, Adelaide has created a single metric, AU, which aggregates many different signals using a machine learning algorithm that predicts the likelihood of attention.

The best way to get started – and begin learning how attention metrics can drive your brand’s success – is to lead with an A/B test comparing attention metrics to viewability. Split your media (or users, if possible) into two segments and optimize one toward viewability and the other to attention metrics. Then, compare the incremental outcomes from both media segments to see which delivered the most efficiency.

If you’re like most advertisers, you’ll quickly find the benefits of attention metrics faster than you can find a guy with a striped hat.

Must Read

Can E.L.F. Cosmetics Become A Consumer Destination, Not Just A Brand?

History can be a burden for a brand, if it means that company is too set in its ways to pivot and try new things. Just consider e.l.f. Cosmetics, the digitial-first, social-native brand that made good.

Digital-native brands need to figure out how to win in retail shelves. They're finding it difficult, to say the least.

DTC Brands Are Learning The Hard Way That Winning In Retail Can Be A Losing Bet

Digital-native brands need to figure out how to win in retail shelves. They’re finding it difficult, to say the least.

Browser Extension Developers Say Google And Apple Need CMA Oversight

A group of 20 web app developers sent a letter to the CMA claiming the regulator’s proposed remedies for increasing competition among mobile browsers do not address barriers to entry for mobile web extensions on iOS and Android.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
A comic depicting people walking past digital billboard screens in a city

TikTok Wants To Win All The Screens, Not Just Your Smartphone

“There are billions of additional screens outside of mobile phones,” says Dan Page, TikTok’s global head of partnerships and new screens. “We want to be in all of them.”

The Trade Desk Says UID2 Has Now Reached ‘Critical Mass’

The Trade Desk delivered another smash earnings report. Meanwhile, Unified ID 2.0, the open-source identity initiative, has “reached a critical mass of adoption,” CEO Jeff Green told investors.

Publicis Acquired Retail Tech With Agency Clients – And Now Those Agencies Want Out

Many of Publicis’ fastest-growing and most strategic business units – including CitrusAd, Profitero, Epsilon and Conversant – earn a large chunk of their revenue from other agencies. Is that a problem?